Saving or Borrowing?
Something has been bugging me for a while in all this credit crisis we’ve been having. The government keeps doing what they can to stimulate the economy and get us out of the credit crunch. They keep trying to get more money into the hand of the banks to free up the credit market and more money into the hands of consumers to encourage us to spend.
Isn’t it the spending that got us into trouble in the first place? It was too much credit that lead to the defaults that worked it’s way up to banks not wanting to lend money to each other. If Americans had been saving more of their income and spending less, then the banks wouldn’t have reached this crisis in the first place.
Of course, if that had happened, our economy wouldn’t have had the great boom we have experienced the last decade or so. If avoiding the bust means avoiding the boom, I think we should consider that option. But, let me run through the scenario to make sure I’ve got this right:
- Economy is booming and people are spending more money than they make, borrowing the rest from the bank.
- The banks lend out lots more money to people than the people are putting into the bank to save.
- Banks run out of money to lend because the lent it all out already.
- Banks go under.
- The government gives the bank more money to try and stimulate the economy back into a boom (see #1)
Maybe it’s just me, but I’m thinking we need to consider how to get out of this little cycle.

